go_guy123
02-24 08:28 AM
Dude
Get your facts straight
Univ of Houston IS NOT a low rank school.
NOR DO THEY ACCEPT 3 YR DEGREES
Please dont give out false info.
Sorry I meant not on the top bracket....
yes they do I know friends who have
BCom + 1 year MCom
BCom + PGDBM ( referred as MBA in India)
getting into uh clear lake campus.
In fact Cal State also was open to the idea of
Degree evaluation for BCom + PGDBM
Get your facts straight
Univ of Houston IS NOT a low rank school.
NOR DO THEY ACCEPT 3 YR DEGREES
Please dont give out false info.
Sorry I meant not on the top bracket....
yes they do I know friends who have
BCom + 1 year MCom
BCom + PGDBM ( referred as MBA in India)
getting into uh clear lake campus.
In fact Cal State also was open to the idea of
Degree evaluation for BCom + PGDBM
wallpaper Dakota Fanning, star of The
ramudu
11-20 08:41 PM
During our Infopass appointment yesterday, we insisted on speaking with a supervisor. He was also no help. All he kept repeating was the case has been approved and the card was in production but he won't be able to issue a letter or an Interim EAD. USCIS has completely done away with those. No changes in status since the first CPO email. Looks like we are in for a long wait. At the moment, my wife can wave a buh' bye to this job and start looking around all over again...it is extremely disappointing.
Yes i went through the same with the info pass. I still don't understand why do they have an Info pass appointment that says 'Interim EAD'. Anyways, I don't expect the card coming my way atleast in the next 2-3 weeks. What i realized is the card production is sourced to a different company and we are at the mercy of that company and USCIS cannot help much. Thanks to USCIS lot of us will lose jobs.
Yes i went through the same with the info pass. I still don't understand why do they have an Info pass appointment that says 'Interim EAD'. Anyways, I don't expect the card coming my way atleast in the next 2-3 weeks. What i realized is the card production is sourced to a different company and we are at the mercy of that company and USCIS cannot help much. Thanks to USCIS lot of us will lose jobs.
widad2020
09-06 02:49 PM
Came on 8/2002
Completed MS on 5/2004
Perm :5/2006
I-140 NSC:FIled 8/2006 Approved:10/2007
I-485 NSC:RD 7/2/2007; ND 9/2/2007 ;
RFE for EVL-current status Pending;
Completed MS on 5/2004
Perm :5/2006
I-140 NSC:FIled 8/2006 Approved:10/2007
I-485 NSC:RD 7/2/2007; ND 9/2/2007 ;
RFE for EVL-current status Pending;
2011 Kristen Stewart and Cherie
sankar_203
08-22 05:07 PM
AC-21 can not be availed if I-140 is revoked by USCIS due to fraud.
________________
Not a legal advice.
Yes. AC21 doens't help if there is fraud detected in 140. Mine was a pretty straight forward case when it comes to credentials. I have filed in Master's Quota(EB2) with 3 years of experience . But if my employer did some thing else for Ability to pay or any other thing i can't help it..leave it to God..
________________
Not a legal advice.
Yes. AC21 doens't help if there is fraud detected in 140. Mine was a pretty straight forward case when it comes to credentials. I have filed in Master's Quota(EB2) with 3 years of experience . But if my employer did some thing else for Ability to pay or any other thing i can't help it..leave it to God..
more...
ntpatil
05-12 09:49 PM
I think Canadian PR would be useful if your destination country is Canada. What is the point in having a Canadian PR and travelling to USA. But again, this is just my assumption.
pappu
07-20 12:28 PM
Some members may face access to donor forum issues. It maybe due to several reasons.
- Their Monthly subscription may have expired/canceled. If that is the case, please renew your subscriptions and we will be able to provide access within a day.
- All recurring contribution signed up prior to 6/6/09 have to sign-up again. We have made some changes in the system. We had sent emails to some such members. If you took action as per the email we sent, and signed up again then you should be having access at this time and can ignore signing up again. If you check your paypal account, it will show that no payment was processed after the initial contribution were made as part of the recurring sign-up. The glitch was fixed sometime back and the system kicked-in yesterday to revoke access based on the recent contribution history. Since the past recurring contribution is not active for these users, it would be great if they could please sign-up for the recurring contribution and help the community effort.
- If you already have a monthly recurring contribution and this access problem is in error, please notify us immediately with your payment details and we will fix the problem. We try our best to manage this access, however there may have been errors. Sorry for this inconvenience.
- In future whenever you contribute to IV do always let us know your IV handle/contribute from your logged in status so that it is easy for the system to associate the contributions with your handle. Else, we have to find out and associate it manually.
We urge everyone interested in supporting ImmigrationVoice more actively to sign up for recurring contributions. This will help IV pursue its agenda more aggressively. The immigration issue is now heating up and we are involved in advocacy efforts at several levels. We have a lot of work going on/planned and in the coming days many updates will be posted.
- Sometimes subscriptions fail for reasons like credit card may have expired. IN that case you may have to renew your subscription to get access.
Please give us at least a couple of days to provide you access once you have signed up. Note that we verify each member before granting access to anyone. We do not guarantee or provide access to everyone who contributes to IV.
Thanks for your support to ImmigrationVoice
IV members,
It will be extremely helpful if you could send in your paypal receipt that contains the
1. userid
2. subscription # or transaction #
3. most recent transaction date for this subscription
4. IF it is a recurring donation - for how many months
5. your phone numbers
If you could send these details to either ivcoordinator@gmail.com or PM it to StarSun, - your info can be processed faster. Incomplete info will take longer to verify.
If you continue to have questions, please call me 202-386-6250.
Without providing the above information - do not demand anything. For members who have provided the info, I will be getting in touch with you.......thank you for your patience.
- Their Monthly subscription may have expired/canceled. If that is the case, please renew your subscriptions and we will be able to provide access within a day.
- All recurring contribution signed up prior to 6/6/09 have to sign-up again. We have made some changes in the system. We had sent emails to some such members. If you took action as per the email we sent, and signed up again then you should be having access at this time and can ignore signing up again. If you check your paypal account, it will show that no payment was processed after the initial contribution were made as part of the recurring sign-up. The glitch was fixed sometime back and the system kicked-in yesterday to revoke access based on the recent contribution history. Since the past recurring contribution is not active for these users, it would be great if they could please sign-up for the recurring contribution and help the community effort.
- If you already have a monthly recurring contribution and this access problem is in error, please notify us immediately with your payment details and we will fix the problem. We try our best to manage this access, however there may have been errors. Sorry for this inconvenience.
- In future whenever you contribute to IV do always let us know your IV handle/contribute from your logged in status so that it is easy for the system to associate the contributions with your handle. Else, we have to find out and associate it manually.
We urge everyone interested in supporting ImmigrationVoice more actively to sign up for recurring contributions. This will help IV pursue its agenda more aggressively. The immigration issue is now heating up and we are involved in advocacy efforts at several levels. We have a lot of work going on/planned and in the coming days many updates will be posted.
- Sometimes subscriptions fail for reasons like credit card may have expired. IN that case you may have to renew your subscription to get access.
Please give us at least a couple of days to provide you access once you have signed up. Note that we verify each member before granting access to anyone. We do not guarantee or provide access to everyone who contributes to IV.
Thanks for your support to ImmigrationVoice
IV members,
It will be extremely helpful if you could send in your paypal receipt that contains the
1. userid
2. subscription # or transaction #
3. most recent transaction date for this subscription
4. IF it is a recurring donation - for how many months
5. your phone numbers
If you could send these details to either ivcoordinator@gmail.com or PM it to StarSun, - your info can be processed faster. Incomplete info will take longer to verify.
If you continue to have questions, please call me 202-386-6250.
Without providing the above information - do not demand anything. For members who have provided the info, I will be getting in touch with you.......thank you for your patience.
more...
Rb_newsletter
04-30 08:33 PM
Just wanted to share.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/28/washington/28IMMIGTIMELINE.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/28/washington/28IMMIGTIMELINE.html
2010 Cherie Currie
gccovet
08-22 01:02 PM
Hi there,
I personally seen two of my friends H1 (extension) got denied.
They both work for different desi companies, have been working ever since they are here in US. Have all the documents up to date required by USCIS...yet they got denied....
One friend's denial was because his education did not match his work...although he did his Engg in Comp. Sci. and working as an programmer analyst.
The other friend is awaiting for the reason...he came to know only couple of days ago, and he is literally in shock.
I dont know whats going on???!!!:(
What happens after H1 ext. is denied. IF a person has EAD, can he keep on working on EAD (AC21)?
GCCovet
I personally seen two of my friends H1 (extension) got denied.
They both work for different desi companies, have been working ever since they are here in US. Have all the documents up to date required by USCIS...yet they got denied....
One friend's denial was because his education did not match his work...although he did his Engg in Comp. Sci. and working as an programmer analyst.
The other friend is awaiting for the reason...he came to know only couple of days ago, and he is literally in shock.
I dont know whats going on???!!!:(
What happens after H1 ext. is denied. IF a person has EAD, can he keep on working on EAD (AC21)?
GCCovet
more...
shukla77
12-01 12:19 PM
At this rate ( looking at the polls)we will be less than 2K in the Rally. We need more participation to get attention of media and lawmakers. So please participate and send emails to friends.
hair kiss. cherie currie dakota
ddl
05-19 01:54 PM
If you know your approx filing date you can ask DOL for the H1B 7 th year extension proof...If they have your application they are most likely to respond in a few days...For more information on how to send that request please go to the DOL.gov website and look around a bit....
If they respond then you would get the case number ...Donot ask for the same multiple times just once .....
I already have a case number D-05192-XXXXX. Does the case number mean only that my application is pending with dallas bec? or does it tell anything about processing time/status?
If they respond then you would get the case number ...Donot ask for the same multiple times just once .....
I already have a case number D-05192-XXXXX. Does the case number mean only that my application is pending with dallas bec? or does it tell anything about processing time/status?
more...
lotsofspace
01-18 05:03 PM
I see a lot of contradictions within his own articles in the same magazine.
Fail to understand how they are so respected !!
From Feeling the Elephant (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2008_01_04/caredit_a0800002) By Beryl Lieff Benderly | Science, 4 Jan 2008
Says Wadhwa, "Everyone gets a lot out of [the present situation]�..All the people who put the reports together have one or another of their personal needs fulfilled � but it doesn�t help the nation."
This visa shortage is a problem for U.S. companies that depend on engineers because significantly more foreign-born students than Americans are completing higher degrees in engineering. The result? Multinationals have little choice but to expand their engineering operations abroad, and smaller businesses that can't afford to expand overseas are unable to hire the talent they need.
With the number of available visas drying up, there's no easy way for the current batch of international students to stay. This means they need to find jobs back home or in other countries. Additionally, there is already a backlog of more than a million skilled immigrants working in the U.S., mostly on H-1B visas, who are waiting for a yearly allocation of 120,000 permanent-resident visas. So we are headed for a massive reverse brain drain of skilled workers and students.
Our loss is likely to be the gain of countries like India and China.
All these students said they would discourage their friends from coming to the U.S.
From The Visa Shortage: Big Problem, Easy Fix (http://http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/oct2007/sb20071017_303173.htm?chan=search) A broken system is driving our best-educated foreign workers�talent desperately needed by U.S. companies�to Europe, India, and China By Vivek Wadhwa | Business Week, Oct 17 2007
Fail to understand how they are so respected !!
From Feeling the Elephant (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2008_01_04/caredit_a0800002) By Beryl Lieff Benderly | Science, 4 Jan 2008
Says Wadhwa, "Everyone gets a lot out of [the present situation]�..All the people who put the reports together have one or another of their personal needs fulfilled � but it doesn�t help the nation."
This visa shortage is a problem for U.S. companies that depend on engineers because significantly more foreign-born students than Americans are completing higher degrees in engineering. The result? Multinationals have little choice but to expand their engineering operations abroad, and smaller businesses that can't afford to expand overseas are unable to hire the talent they need.
With the number of available visas drying up, there's no easy way for the current batch of international students to stay. This means they need to find jobs back home or in other countries. Additionally, there is already a backlog of more than a million skilled immigrants working in the U.S., mostly on H-1B visas, who are waiting for a yearly allocation of 120,000 permanent-resident visas. So we are headed for a massive reverse brain drain of skilled workers and students.
Our loss is likely to be the gain of countries like India and China.
All these students said they would discourage their friends from coming to the U.S.
From The Visa Shortage: Big Problem, Easy Fix (http://http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/oct2007/sb20071017_303173.htm?chan=search) A broken system is driving our best-educated foreign workers�talent desperately needed by U.S. companies�to Europe, India, and China By Vivek Wadhwa | Business Week, Oct 17 2007
hot Dakota Fanning and Cherie
andy garcia
09-25 01:18 PM
Is It introduced lately in the senate ?
SA 2238. Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. Grassley) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2143 submitted by Mr. Cornyn and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 1585, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
blah, blah, .......
SA 2238. Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. Grassley) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2143 submitted by Mr. Cornyn and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 1585, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
blah, blah, .......
more...
house Dakota Fanning is Cherie
p_kumar
07-06 01:41 PM
Are you guys nuts?????????:eek:
tattoo dakota fanning Dakotaspl115948
i_aged_out
04-01 07:40 AM
Pappu, you are right about the points you made in your post. Unfortunately though, there are probably not too many of us. Moreover, most of us aged out students probably are not too experienced with these issues and most of us are probably busy finishing our college or attending grad school. But if there are any other aged out kids or parents of aged out kids in here that want to join in and support this, we all can form a sizable group to fight this by generating media storm ?!? But this is an important long term goal...
For now, there is a bill already introduced in congress. It will soon be debated and voted upon. Given the short amount of time we have, our best bet is to try to at least have some of the senators to notice this issue. I like the idea of meeting up with Senators. I'm going to try to meet up with my California senators/representatives. But for those who can't do this, we have to make sure we call/fax/email. Please don't give up hope. Dream act community has been vigorously calling in. So are the NumberUSA, ALIPAC and other anti-immigration groups.
indianabacklog, thomachan72, rego, and others, I repeatedly read through the newly uploaded text of the bill on government site http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.729:
and I might have some good news for you guys....read on.
Firstly, throughout the whole text there is actually no mention of 'illegal' or 'undocumented' aliens. Perhaps, this is because, there are several kids who were brought here on visitor or any other temporary visa and they never leave. In fact, there are several Mexican families that have done this using the Mexican Non-Immigrant "Laser Visas."
Anyways, Section 4.(a).(1) is probably the most worrisome portion of this text because of the two words - 'Deportable' and 'Inadmissible' - that are used to describe the type of aliens that this act applies to. Here is the snippet...
(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law and except as otherwise provided in this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security may cancel removal of, and adjust to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, subject to the conditional basis described in section 5, an alien who is inadmissible or deportable from the United States, if the alien demonstrates that--
...
...
...
The words "inadmissible" and "deportable" does not only apply to undocumented students but others as well. So, if you are 'inadmissible' OR 'Deportable' and if you fall under the other guidelines, you will be eligible for this law. Now the main question is what does the keyword 'Inadmissible' mean ? Title 8 Chapter 12 Subchapter II, Section 1182 of the U.S. Code describes what 'Inadmissible Alien' means. Here is the link to this section :
http://law.justia.com/us/codes/title8/8usc1182.html
Here is an extraction concerning student visa..Section (a).(6).(G).
(G) Student visa abusers
An alien who obtains the status of a non-immigrant under section 1101(a)(15)(F)(i) of this title and who violates a term or condition of such status under section 1184(l) \2\ of this title is inadmissible until the alien has been outside the United States for a continuous period of 5 years after the date of the violation.
.According to this section, you violate the sections above and become inadmissible if you break one of the rules like taking less than 12 college units or if you don't apply for OPT and stay here after graduation etc. It is funny that we might have to become inadmissible in order to claim the benefits...but what can I say !
Perhaps, the main problem is that most of the senators think that students in this situation are all illegals. They are not aware of scenarios where legal children of H1B employees who are brought here as minors, are sometimes forced to become foreigners. Who ever came up with the AGE-OUT rule really is dumb...sorry to say this but I could not find any good reason behind this.
Anyways, I am not a lawyer of any sort. This is just my interpretation of the bill. I will need to contact a lawyer regarding this. This is most likely a side-effect of the bill or simply a loop-hole that is hard to refute...What do you guys think ? Please let me know if I am missing something here...
For now, there is a bill already introduced in congress. It will soon be debated and voted upon. Given the short amount of time we have, our best bet is to try to at least have some of the senators to notice this issue. I like the idea of meeting up with Senators. I'm going to try to meet up with my California senators/representatives. But for those who can't do this, we have to make sure we call/fax/email. Please don't give up hope. Dream act community has been vigorously calling in. So are the NumberUSA, ALIPAC and other anti-immigration groups.
indianabacklog, thomachan72, rego, and others, I repeatedly read through the newly uploaded text of the bill on government site http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.729:
and I might have some good news for you guys....read on.
Firstly, throughout the whole text there is actually no mention of 'illegal' or 'undocumented' aliens. Perhaps, this is because, there are several kids who were brought here on visitor or any other temporary visa and they never leave. In fact, there are several Mexican families that have done this using the Mexican Non-Immigrant "Laser Visas."
Anyways, Section 4.(a).(1) is probably the most worrisome portion of this text because of the two words - 'Deportable' and 'Inadmissible' - that are used to describe the type of aliens that this act applies to. Here is the snippet...
(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law and except as otherwise provided in this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security may cancel removal of, and adjust to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, subject to the conditional basis described in section 5, an alien who is inadmissible or deportable from the United States, if the alien demonstrates that--
...
...
...
The words "inadmissible" and "deportable" does not only apply to undocumented students but others as well. So, if you are 'inadmissible' OR 'Deportable' and if you fall under the other guidelines, you will be eligible for this law. Now the main question is what does the keyword 'Inadmissible' mean ? Title 8 Chapter 12 Subchapter II, Section 1182 of the U.S. Code describes what 'Inadmissible Alien' means. Here is the link to this section :
http://law.justia.com/us/codes/title8/8usc1182.html
Here is an extraction concerning student visa..Section (a).(6).(G).
(G) Student visa abusers
An alien who obtains the status of a non-immigrant under section 1101(a)(15)(F)(i) of this title and who violates a term or condition of such status under section 1184(l) \2\ of this title is inadmissible until the alien has been outside the United States for a continuous period of 5 years after the date of the violation.
.According to this section, you violate the sections above and become inadmissible if you break one of the rules like taking less than 12 college units or if you don't apply for OPT and stay here after graduation etc. It is funny that we might have to become inadmissible in order to claim the benefits...but what can I say !
Perhaps, the main problem is that most of the senators think that students in this situation are all illegals. They are not aware of scenarios where legal children of H1B employees who are brought here as minors, are sometimes forced to become foreigners. Who ever came up with the AGE-OUT rule really is dumb...sorry to say this but I could not find any good reason behind this.
Anyways, I am not a lawyer of any sort. This is just my interpretation of the bill. I will need to contact a lawyer regarding this. This is most likely a side-effect of the bill or simply a loop-hole that is hard to refute...What do you guys think ? Please let me know if I am missing something here...
more...
pictures Dakota Fanning was filming a
dixie
09-08 12:38 AM
Some people are just vocal about disagreeing with the prevailing opinion and trying to sell theirs as the only salvation. There is no point in incessantly arguing with them.. after you have made your point its best to just ignore such arguments. Recognize that at the end of the day we are all just armchair critics. Ultimately, the core team members are the ones who are aware of the ground situation as it evolves and I trust they will do what is best for all of us.
Well apparently it is not just those groups who think that way, brb2 on this forum told me that there is a law that requires me to carry identification papers all the time!
Although there are some sane voices here, what is becoming clear to me is that those who want to water down the skil Bill (and call it SkUL bill), those who think there is nothing wrong in the law that requires non-citizens to carry papers, and those who criticize me for comparing the anti-immigrants to KK are becoming a vocal minority. Or maybe a majority?
Maybe I should stop coming here. :confused:
qplearn
Well apparently it is not just those groups who think that way, brb2 on this forum told me that there is a law that requires me to carry identification papers all the time!
Although there are some sane voices here, what is becoming clear to me is that those who want to water down the skil Bill (and call it SkUL bill), those who think there is nothing wrong in the law that requires non-citizens to carry papers, and those who criticize me for comparing the anti-immigrants to KK are becoming a vocal minority. Or maybe a majority?
Maybe I should stop coming here. :confused:
qplearn
dresses Cherie Currie and Michael
gcdedo
05-30 09:50 AM
Labor Certified!!!
I received a Mail from my Employer that my Labor has been Certified
Details:
PD : Dec 15, 2004
ETA Case No: D-05200-35XXX
State : IL
Type :RIR
45 Day Letter : April 11, 2006
Replied : April 24 , 2006
Labor Certified: May 18 , 2006
Letter received to Employer : May 30, 2006
I received a Mail from my Employer that my Labor has been Certified
Details:
PD : Dec 15, 2004
ETA Case No: D-05200-35XXX
State : IL
Type :RIR
45 Day Letter : April 11, 2006
Replied : April 24 , 2006
Labor Certified: May 18 , 2006
Letter received to Employer : May 30, 2006
more...
makeup and Cherie Currie (Dakota
priderock
07-26 03:03 PM
Can some one close this thread?l It is such a waist of time. I think logiclife answer is very complete
You mean waste of time ?
I know , you do :) , Just couldn't resist. :)
You mean waste of time ?
I know , you do :) , Just couldn't resist. :)
girlfriend the role of Cherie Currie.
NKR
01-31 04:11 PM
[ thanks guys for the red dots and your flattering comments. Shows that a person cannot have an alternate point of view with regards to taxes. As I said before to eb3_nepa, with regards to taxes, its my view and mine alone. I never said it was universally fair, I just said its fair for me. ]
[ then u need to get a thicker skin. its an open forum with opinions flying back and forth....its nothing to do with immigrants rights. its to do with taxes...i m sorry if some of the spouses have been left out in this process, but again I feel that its fair. end of story.]
Yabadaba..
Your first post above contradicts your second post below it. Now you can go back to your yada yada...
[ then u need to get a thicker skin. its an open forum with opinions flying back and forth....its nothing to do with immigrants rights. its to do with taxes...i m sorry if some of the spouses have been left out in this process, but again I feel that its fair. end of story.]
Yabadaba..
Your first post above contradicts your second post below it. Now you can go back to your yada yada...
hairstyles Dakota Fanning (as Cherie
sandiboy
07-26 02:55 PM
Some positive news. Jul 29th cases getting receipts:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11205
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11205
sr1973
08-01 02:50 PM
I got the magic email today
Here are my particulars
PD - Jan 2004 EB2 India
RD - Jun 27 -2007
ND - Aug 8 -2008 TX
Congrats and have a nice weekend.. If you have a membership, please update the details as well..
Here are my particulars
PD - Jan 2004 EB2 India
RD - Jun 27 -2007
ND - Aug 8 -2008 TX
Congrats and have a nice weekend.. If you have a membership, please update the details as well..
getit
02-16 05:50 PM
-------------
Q. If I have a valid Social Security Number and my child has an ITIN, do I get extra money for the child?
A. No. To qualify for the extra credit for qualifying children, not only do the taxpayer and spouse, if filing jointly, need valid Social Security Numbers, but the qualifying child must also have a valid Social Security Number.
--------------
On AOS, I think I would hold my 1040 and spend $340 to file a EAD for my 10-year-old son and get a SSN and get $300 back. Last year, we got the child credit with ITIN but I am not sure about this year. This country has gone too far.
Q. If I have a valid Social Security Number and my child has an ITIN, do I get extra money for the child?
A. No. To qualify for the extra credit for qualifying children, not only do the taxpayer and spouse, if filing jointly, need valid Social Security Numbers, but the qualifying child must also have a valid Social Security Number.
--------------
On AOS, I think I would hold my 1040 and spend $340 to file a EAD for my 10-year-old son and get a SSN and get $300 back. Last year, we got the child credit with ITIN but I am not sure about this year. This country has gone too far.
