Leo07
05-03 05:47 PM
Dems could squander this opportunity if they don't act fast...well we have more to lose than anybody:(
Sahil Kapur: Squandered Opportunity? Democrats Put Off Immigration (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sahil-kapur/squandered-opportunity-de_b_561743.html)
Sahil Kapur: Squandered Opportunity? Democrats Put Off Immigration (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sahil-kapur/squandered-opportunity-de_b_561743.html)
wallpaper Anime Eyes Make-up
mdumar
09-09 11:27 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/790261-post14.html
Winner,
Over $10,000 was collected for FOIA on an issue basis. It was never told then by IV that only those who are recurring members would get an update on FOIA.
All others,
nixster has been leading the effort on FOIA. I had sent a PM to him. It seems he is little bit busy since they just had a new born baby (week old) and would post an update about FOIA on the normal forums in a couple of days.
Winner,
Over $10,000 was collected for FOIA on an issue basis. It was never told then by IV that only those who are recurring members would get an update on FOIA.
All others,
nixster has been leading the effort on FOIA. I had sent a PM to him. It seems he is little bit busy since they just had a new born baby (week old) and would post an update about FOIA on the normal forums in a couple of days.
skynet2500
11-04 10:30 PM
Got EAD card in mail today. Got PDA mail on Nov 1. Good luck to all...
2011 Dolly Doll eyes make up .
abhijitp
07-31 11:33 AM
Rep Davis' office said he already supports.
more...
priderock
04-25 11:43 PM
I have a 3 years Engineering diploma plus a 3 year Engineering bachelor degree. We were given an advance standing in B.Tech (4 years for people with 10+2) and we completed it in 3 years. So it is 10+3+3 = 16 years of education. (I am from India)
My Attorney thinks this might be a problem at NSC at I140 in EB2 because of a 3 year degree. But it (B.Tech) is in fact a 4 year degree, and we were allowed to finish in 3 years. After 1 st year we attend the classes with 3rd year students of 4 year program. Take same courses and same tests.
How can I convince my Attorney and TSC that it is equivalent to a 4 year BTech degree in India and equivalent to US bachelor degree ?
I guess confusion arises from the fact that NSC does not recognize a 3 year BSc+ PG diploma from NIIT as equivalent to US BS degree.
Edit : My education evaluation was done by TrustForte. Are there any other evaluators that are more familiar with Indian Education system and also trusted by USCIS ?
My Attorney thinks this might be a problem at NSC at I140 in EB2 because of a 3 year degree. But it (B.Tech) is in fact a 4 year degree, and we were allowed to finish in 3 years. After 1 st year we attend the classes with 3rd year students of 4 year program. Take same courses and same tests.
How can I convince my Attorney and TSC that it is equivalent to a 4 year BTech degree in India and equivalent to US bachelor degree ?
I guess confusion arises from the fact that NSC does not recognize a 3 year BSc+ PG diploma from NIIT as equivalent to US BS degree.
Edit : My education evaluation was done by TrustForte. Are there any other evaluators that are more familiar with Indian Education system and also trusted by USCIS ?
raj2007
06-13 11:12 PM
Hi
Firstly congratulations to everyone who qualify to file their I-145's:)
How does this affect all the single ppl here? if they marry after filing their i-485's can their wives be included in the application? how does this work?
They can follow to Join route if they marry one day before approval.
Firstly congratulations to everyone who qualify to file their I-145's:)
How does this affect all the single ppl here? if they marry after filing their i-485's can their wives be included in the application? how does this work?
They can follow to Join route if they marry one day before approval.
more...
BKY
05-12 06:14 PM
Guys,
I just called Air India customer service to ask about Transit Visa requirement at Frankfurt.
The guy on the phone told me that the Transit Visa is not required at Frankfurt. I specifically asked him about Transit Visa requirement for people travelling on Advance Parole. He replied saying that in any case, Transit Visa is not required at Frankfurt.
I guess the information on Air India website is regarding the London Transit visa as the Air India flights were used to travel Via London till 5 years back.
And that information might not be updated in last 5 years.
I just called Air India customer service to ask about Transit Visa requirement at Frankfurt.
The guy on the phone told me that the Transit Visa is not required at Frankfurt. I specifically asked him about Transit Visa requirement for people travelling on Advance Parole. He replied saying that in any case, Transit Visa is not required at Frankfurt.
I guess the information on Air India website is regarding the London Transit visa as the Air India flights were used to travel Via London till 5 years back.
And that information might not be updated in last 5 years.
2010 Eye Makeup How To: Monolids
GCard_Dream
09-21 05:37 PM
Does it mean that we are done?
Well .. your guess is as good as mine. I haven't heard anyone talk about us or even acknowledge the fact that legal immigration is broken to a point where it's becoming simply hopeless. In fact I believe it was Kennedy who said that there is no need to improve the current legal immigration system. There was hundreds of hours of discussion on the TV about the immigration but I hardly heard anything about the reform in the legal immigration system. America's fascination and love with the illegals probably has created the problem of illegal immigration today as we see it. Good luck solving it.
Time and again illegal folks have been given the benefit of the doubt and awarded with amnesty. When was the last time U.S. government said that okay legals.. you don't have to wait in line for half of your life to get your GC... here it is and now go have fun.
Well .. your guess is as good as mine. I haven't heard anyone talk about us or even acknowledge the fact that legal immigration is broken to a point where it's becoming simply hopeless. In fact I believe it was Kennedy who said that there is no need to improve the current legal immigration system. There was hundreds of hours of discussion on the TV about the immigration but I hardly heard anything about the reform in the legal immigration system. America's fascination and love with the illegals probably has created the problem of illegal immigration today as we see it. Good luck solving it.
Time and again illegal folks have been given the benefit of the doubt and awarded with amnesty. When was the last time U.S. government said that okay legals.. you don't have to wait in line for half of your life to get your GC... here it is and now go have fun.
more...
indianindian2006
02-08 08:50 PM
Will those spouses with SSN but not working qualify for this money or only one spouse who is actually working.
TIA
TIA
hair makeup japanese eyes
modvik
03-29 06:52 PM
What happened finally with the hard country limit? Looks like that still made it through without any amendments. That will only increase backlogs, atleast for EB3.
Is there some way we can push for an amendment when the bill reaches the house? Or during reconciliation between the house and senate bills?
Is there some way we can push for an amendment when the bill reaches the house? Or during reconciliation between the house and senate bills?
more...
ramus
06-13 05:44 PM
I think they must want to type 'U' instead of 'C'
I called but they still have June message..
something is wrong
All
Charge-ability
Areas
Except
Those
Listed
CHINA-
mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIP-PINES
Employ-ment
-Based
1st C C C C C
2nd C C C C C
3rd C C C C C
I called but they still have June message..
something is wrong
All
Charge-ability
Areas
Except
Those
Listed
CHINA-
mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIP-PINES
Employ-ment
-Based
1st C C C C C
2nd C C C C C
3rd C C C C C
hot most Japanese and Korean
Berkeleybee
03-19 01:57 PM
I think there is not much harm here because the new law says any unused numbers in the previous year will be added to the 290,000 quota next year. So, even we don't get the numbers this year due to the per country limit, next year the size of the cake will be a lot larger.
Couldn't help checking the forum as I dash around today.
Zheng, isn't the point of the whole exercise to decrease the wait? You'll wait another year, during which time even more people will have joined the queue.
If CIR is supposed to reduce backlogs and waiting times, this is not the way to do it.
I don't know about you but a year is a long time in my life. Esp after waiting for so many years already. Making me wait yet another year when there is no need for me to wait is HARM by my definition.
Couldn't help checking the forum as I dash around today.
Zheng, isn't the point of the whole exercise to decrease the wait? You'll wait another year, during which time even more people will have joined the queue.
If CIR is supposed to reduce backlogs and waiting times, this is not the way to do it.
I don't know about you but a year is a long time in my life. Esp after waiting for so many years already. Making me wait yet another year when there is no need for me to wait is HARM by my definition.
more...
house big japanese eyes makeup,
crzyBanker
11-03 07:37 AM
1st CPO 13th
2nd CPO 29th
PDA Nov 1st
2nd CPO 29th
PDA Nov 1st
tattoo japanese eyes makeup_27.
dhirajs98
07-17 12:37 PM
Today I received the screen shot from my employer and found out that following informations are missing:
Processing Type, Case Source and Data Entry assigned to
I would like to know the significance of the above missing informations and does it affect the labor approval process?
In the screen shot, case received date is 01/10/2005 and Case Status is Data Review.
Please let me know if these missing info can have any negative affect my case? And if answer is YES then what should I do?
Thanks for your help in advance..
dhirajs98
Processing Type, Case Source and Data Entry assigned to
I would like to know the significance of the above missing informations and does it affect the labor approval process?
In the screen shot, case received date is 01/10/2005 and Case Status is Data Review.
Please let me know if these missing info can have any negative affect my case? And if answer is YES then what should I do?
Thanks for your help in advance..
dhirajs98
more...
pictures A Japanese girl in Harajuku
cvt123
05-23 06:23 PM
[GCCard_Dream]Before you accuse me of coming up with an arbitrary date, I suggest you do some homework yourself and go read the draft. I have posted the content of the bill where it explicitely specifies the cut off date (date of the introduction of the bill). If you don't want to do any reading and just pass comments then go ahead and do that but that won't change what's in the bill.
Here is the your quote from the bill.
2) PENDING AND APPROVED PETITIONS AND APPLICATIONS.�Petitions
22 for an employment-based visa filed for classification under
23 section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Immigration and Nationality
24 Act (as such provisions existed prior to the enactment of this
25 section) that were filed prior to the date of the introduction of
26 the [Insert title of Act] and were pending or approved at the time of
27 the effective date of this section, shall be treated as if such
28 provision remained effective and an approved petition may serve
29 as the basis for issuance of an immigrant visa. Aliens with
30 applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
31 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
32 preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
33 of filing of such labor certification application.
where does it say introduction of "BILL" ?? You are just reading between the lines and assuming the worst..(But if it helps the fund drive then it's great..)To me it just says that, the date when the law is going to be enacted or the first day the law comes into play. Historically, it never happened and it never will be. I am only trying to be positive here.
cvt..
Here is the your quote from the bill.
2) PENDING AND APPROVED PETITIONS AND APPLICATIONS.�Petitions
22 for an employment-based visa filed for classification under
23 section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Immigration and Nationality
24 Act (as such provisions existed prior to the enactment of this
25 section) that were filed prior to the date of the introduction of
26 the [Insert title of Act] and were pending or approved at the time of
27 the effective date of this section, shall be treated as if such
28 provision remained effective and an approved petition may serve
29 as the basis for issuance of an immigrant visa. Aliens with
30 applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
31 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
32 preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
33 of filing of such labor certification application.
where does it say introduction of "BILL" ?? You are just reading between the lines and assuming the worst..(But if it helps the fund drive then it's great..)To me it just says that, the date when the law is going to be enacted or the first day the law comes into play. Historically, it never happened and it never will be. I am only trying to be positive here.
cvt..
dresses girlfriend japanese eyes
nk2
06-26 01:19 PM
please reply - thanks
more...
makeup hair Japanese Big Eyes Makeup
h1-b forever
09-14 08:44 AM
I'm apply for an adjustment of status for gc (hopefully) on sept 16th (this thursday) I need to fly out to new zealnd on nov 5th which is 50 days away. what is my chance of getting AP in time?:(
Anywhere between a month and 3 months........
Anywhere between a month and 3 months........
girlfriend Trendy Japanese » makeup
bigboy007
11-02 12:37 AM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
hairstyles thanks to the Japanese,
WeShallOvercome
07-26 01:22 PM
Don't panic and try to re-interpret past statements and FAQ and put it in all together a new context.
It depends on how the customer rep understood the question and also depends lot on her knowledge about the whole july fiasco.:D
Again this is a false alarm.
And may be she interpreted his question like he was asking about his I-485 approval instead of receipt number...
all the answers she gave him align perfectly with this question "My I-485 has been filed, when will i get my approval"
It depends on how the customer rep understood the question and also depends lot on her knowledge about the whole july fiasco.:D
Again this is a false alarm.
And may be she interpreted his question like he was asking about his I-485 approval instead of receipt number...
all the answers she gave him align perfectly with this question "My I-485 has been filed, when will i get my approval"
Asian
09-07 09:29 AM
Mmmm... Seven years sounds a bit long to me in this modern century. How about +5 years?
As I have mentioned before we need to be creative. Lobbying for a law or whatever that gives GC to H1B holders who are on H1B for more than 7 years is the easiest way out because this will not cause much grief - as these people are allready in USA and allready working and paying taxes for 7+ years and giving them GC will not increase the labour pool (which is the main concern for anti immigrant lobbies). Also providing GC to these people will unleash a wave of benefits to the local economy as these new GC holders will now confidently invest in the US economy.
We need somebody who is capable of carrying this message to the heart of the congress and the senators.
As I have mentioned before we need to be creative. Lobbying for a law or whatever that gives GC to H1B holders who are on H1B for more than 7 years is the easiest way out because this will not cause much grief - as these people are allready in USA and allready working and paying taxes for 7+ years and giving them GC will not increase the labour pool (which is the main concern for anti immigrant lobbies). Also providing GC to these people will unleash a wave of benefits to the local economy as these new GC holders will now confidently invest in the US economy.
We need somebody who is capable of carrying this message to the heart of the congress and the senators.
factoryman
06-13 09:26 PM
and it is Oct 07 to Sep 08.
So, be very very careful if your PD is current and it is Sep 07.
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
FY-2008 starts with OCT-2008.
So, be very very careful if your PD is current and it is Sep 07.
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
FY-2008 starts with OCT-2008.
