satyasrd
04-29 09:06 AM
Thanks for supporting me TeddyKoochu !
I am sure there are many others who missed the 2007 fiasco and waiting patiently. And I believe allowing pre-filing is an admin fix, correct ?
I am sure there are many others who missed the 2007 fiasco and waiting patiently. And I believe allowing pre-filing is an admin fix, correct ?
wallpaper pictures cristina urgel
shukla77
07-02 01:29 PM
I had the same question and looking for answers..
Did you get a reply to this?
The IRS website mentions "aggregate value of all accounts exceeding $10,000 ...".
Is it same as total deposit in a year exceeding $10,000?
Or, does it mean, balance at anytime exceeding $10,000?
Did you get a reply to this?
The IRS website mentions "aggregate value of all accounts exceeding $10,000 ...".
Is it same as total deposit in a year exceeding $10,000?
Or, does it mean, balance at anytime exceeding $10,000?
rahulpaper
09-05 10:45 PM
Came to US Aug 1998.
First Labor Jan2003
Second Labor Jan 2005
PERM OCT 2006...=>PD.
Got laid off from one job and other I quit myself. Some people argue that I am waiting for only last 2 years since PD is Oct 2006.
July 07 Filer...Thanks to IV otherwise my 485 would still be not in.
I do have 4yr Bachelor from India and MS from US and currently pursuing EMBA (ivy league)...so life never stops in US... I only hope USCIS could do a better job on maintaining proper FIFO based on PD.
First Labor Jan2003
Second Labor Jan 2005
PERM OCT 2006...=>PD.
Got laid off from one job and other I quit myself. Some people argue that I am waiting for only last 2 years since PD is Oct 2006.
July 07 Filer...Thanks to IV otherwise my 485 would still be not in.
I do have 4yr Bachelor from India and MS from US and currently pursuing EMBA (ivy league)...so life never stops in US... I only hope USCIS could do a better job on maintaining proper FIFO based on PD.
2011 cristina urgel y kate del
winadmin
10-27 09:40 PM
Hi Folks,
Here is my Info
765 Receipt Date: Aug 03'10
Notice date: Aug 05'10
Service Center: NSC
Expedite Requested: Yes
If Yes : What date: 10/12
Card Production Email (1..n): Date ? 10/14
Existing EAD Card Expiry :11/12/10
Change of address after EAD Application : NO
Here is my Info
765 Receipt Date: Aug 03'10
Notice date: Aug 05'10
Service Center: NSC
Expedite Requested: Yes
If Yes : What date: 10/12
Card Production Email (1..n): Date ? 10/14
Existing EAD Card Expiry :11/12/10
Change of address after EAD Application : NO
more...
kodak57
06-17 10:36 AM
nixstor,
I filed my application with 864 and had no issues. It was approved last year in July along with my wife's app.
Do we need to fill form I-864 or form I -134 for affidavit of support? A friend of mine who filed with murthy this month is forwarding his set of documents. The documents he filled in includes 134 and not 864. I am looking at uscis website and I am trying to figure out what is the difference between the two. Does any one have more info on the difference between the two documents?
Which one should EB guys should be doing?
snip from I-134 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=fe3647a55773d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
Purpose of Form :
To show that visa applicants have sponsorship and will not become public charges while in the United States. The sponsor must file a separate affidavit for each applicant.
Snip from Form I-864 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=b70f8875d714d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
To show that the applying immigrant has enough financial support to live without concern of becoming reliant on U.S. government welfare.
I filed my application with 864 and had no issues. It was approved last year in July along with my wife's app.
Do we need to fill form I-864 or form I -134 for affidavit of support? A friend of mine who filed with murthy this month is forwarding his set of documents. The documents he filled in includes 134 and not 864. I am looking at uscis website and I am trying to figure out what is the difference between the two. Does any one have more info on the difference between the two documents?
Which one should EB guys should be doing?
snip from I-134 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=fe3647a55773d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
Purpose of Form :
To show that visa applicants have sponsorship and will not become public charges while in the United States. The sponsor must file a separate affidavit for each applicant.
Snip from Form I-864 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=b70f8875d714d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)
To show that the applying immigrant has enough financial support to live without concern of becoming reliant on U.S. government welfare.
malibuguy007
07-30 02:54 PM
Called two and going through the list. Had to stop to go into a meeting. Also had 3 of my relatives who are citizens call. I am sure citizen especially constituents have a much bigger impact.
more...
amitga
01-25 07:09 PM
I just got a reply from SOS office :
Thank you for using the Department of State's web site and for taking
the time to express your concerns about Michigan’s new driver license
requirements, in which first time applicants for a driver license or ID
card must prove they have established permanent legal presence in the
United States. These new requirements align Michigan’s procedure
with those of most other states.
Please be aware that Secretary Land has also been working to enhance
driver license security by proposing the creation of an upgraded
“standard” driver license. This license will tie a legal, temporary
resident’s driver license expiration date to their U.S. Entry Visa
expiration date. This will allow students and employees legally, but
temporarily, in the U.S. to obtain a driver license. This is the type of driver
license that you are able to obtain by not being a permanent resident,
but a legal immigrant. Updated procedures for renewing a current
driver license will be released soon.
In an additional concept, Secretary Land is working on an optional
“enhanced” version which Michigan residents, who are also U.S.
citizens, may use in place of a passport at the Canadian border. Her proposals
for both the standard and enhanced driver licenses are being
considered by the Legislature.
Again, thank you for making us aware of your concerns. For more
information on Secretary Land’s initiative, please visit
www.Michigan.gov/sos. It is titled “The Drive for a Safer Michigan” and is found
under “News and Headlines.”
If you have other questions, feel free to contact us at 888 SOSMICH
(888-767-6424).
Sincerely,
XXXXXXXXX, Specialist
Department of State Information Center
Thank you for using the Department of State's web site and for taking
the time to express your concerns about Michigan’s new driver license
requirements, in which first time applicants for a driver license or ID
card must prove they have established permanent legal presence in the
United States. These new requirements align Michigan’s procedure
with those of most other states.
Please be aware that Secretary Land has also been working to enhance
driver license security by proposing the creation of an upgraded
“standard” driver license. This license will tie a legal, temporary
resident’s driver license expiration date to their U.S. Entry Visa
expiration date. This will allow students and employees legally, but
temporarily, in the U.S. to obtain a driver license. This is the type of driver
license that you are able to obtain by not being a permanent resident,
but a legal immigrant. Updated procedures for renewing a current
driver license will be released soon.
In an additional concept, Secretary Land is working on an optional
“enhanced” version which Michigan residents, who are also U.S.
citizens, may use in place of a passport at the Canadian border. Her proposals
for both the standard and enhanced driver licenses are being
considered by the Legislature.
Again, thank you for making us aware of your concerns. For more
information on Secretary Land’s initiative, please visit
www.Michigan.gov/sos. It is titled “The Drive for a Safer Michigan” and is found
under “News and Headlines.”
If you have other questions, feel free to contact us at 888 SOSMICH
(888-767-6424).
Sincerely,
XXXXXXXXX, Specialist
Department of State Information Center
2010 cristina urgel premios
houston_TX
07-03 11:23 PM
smartsteve is right!
What is being seen here is an extreme irrational response, which will lead to nothing. Still if people feel that sending flowers will help they should do it (although if anybody feels this will actually change how the USCIS functions, they are either extremely naive or highly delusional)
What is being seen here is an extreme irrational response, which will lead to nothing. Still if people feel that sending flowers will help they should do it (although if anybody feels this will actually change how the USCIS functions, they are either extremely naive or highly delusional)
more...
patiently_waiting
09-27 03:22 PM
thanks
hair de los Premios Billboard
NYC-circuit
10-16 08:32 AM
Dear alkg,
USCIS has no order in processing these applications, I applied on July 27th my checks are not cashed yet. One of my colleagues who works for the same company and used the same attorney applied on August 17th and got his checks cashed. All I can think of is that they have no FIFO basis. I think they are storing all the applications and grab the applications they can reach. May be our application is in the bottom of a pile.
These are my thoughts and I hope we will hear something before the end of October
Regards
USCIS has no order in processing these applications, I applied on July 27th my checks are not cashed yet. One of my colleagues who works for the same company and used the same attorney applied on August 17th and got his checks cashed. All I can think of is that they have no FIFO basis. I think they are storing all the applications and grab the applications they can reach. May be our application is in the bottom of a pile.
These are my thoughts and I hope we will hear something before the end of October
Regards
more...
perm
06-18 10:24 AM
"Birth Certificate OR 2 Affidavits and a certificate of non availability for each applicant "
Does anyone have a format for Affidavits for Birth certificate? Is it ok If notorized in India? Is it ok if I can use an old Affidavits (notorized in 2004)?
What is a ceritifcate of non availability?
Does anyone have a format for Affidavits for Birth certificate? Is it ok If notorized in India? Is it ok if I can use an old Affidavits (notorized in 2004)?
What is a ceritifcate of non availability?
hot 2011 cristina urgel premios billboard. pulando da escada by cristina urgel
harapatta
04-27 01:17 PM
Hi AUTO123
I also in same boat with 3 year diploma + 3 year BE with EB2 I-140 pending @NSC. I am also expecting RFE on this.
Did you submit any evaluations for RFE OR just letters from your college/polytechnic?
Did you submit letters from both polytechnic and BE college?
Is it possible to send some sample of those letters?
Please help me on this.
I really appreciate your help.
Harapatta
Answer to original poster: Your 3 year B.Tech is absolutely eligible for EB2, provided if you have at least studied 4 years in accredited college/polytechnic to receive your terminal B.Tech degree, after 12 years of high school diploma. There is a difference between combination of education and pattern of education. Your�s falls into different pattern of education. So, you are fine. I am one of the classic example successfully got 140 approval from NSC in EB2 after a RFE. Mine also 3 year B.Tech. Do not spend money on education equivalency evaluation. USCIS do not care even if you submit 10 evaluations from different companies, they do not recognize. Fist, edu.evaluation is opinion only. It is not a binding document. Gets a letter from your school explaining the education pattern. It is more efficient. I did the same. They approve my 140 on the same date they reciived my reply.
The entire education equivalency has been screwed up by desi companies, desi workers, education evaluation agency and of course lawyers. USCIS had been very flexible till last 5 or 6 years. Because of substantial abuse, the USCIS had become stricter on the education evaluation. Peoples try to combine any degree (like 3 year b.com and 1 year PG diploma) to arrive at equivalent to 4 year BS in computer science. I have seen a post by one guy got a evaluation saying that his 3 year BSc in geography + 1 year computer course in NIIT/Aptech equal to 4 year BS in Comp.Sc. USCIS is not stupid to accept this is equivalent to 4 years computer science. I am not undermining any degree or school. Because of so much abuse, genuine guys like you and me I got affected. Though I studied in highly reputed schools, I got RFE in 140. It was a big surprise for me. It took tremendous amount of time/money/energy to overcome the RFE, though I graduated from one of the top 10 engineering school in India comparable standard with IITs.
Do not worry.. It will be alright..
I also in same boat with 3 year diploma + 3 year BE with EB2 I-140 pending @NSC. I am also expecting RFE on this.
Did you submit any evaluations for RFE OR just letters from your college/polytechnic?
Did you submit letters from both polytechnic and BE college?
Is it possible to send some sample of those letters?
Please help me on this.
I really appreciate your help.
Harapatta
Answer to original poster: Your 3 year B.Tech is absolutely eligible for EB2, provided if you have at least studied 4 years in accredited college/polytechnic to receive your terminal B.Tech degree, after 12 years of high school diploma. There is a difference between combination of education and pattern of education. Your�s falls into different pattern of education. So, you are fine. I am one of the classic example successfully got 140 approval from NSC in EB2 after a RFE. Mine also 3 year B.Tech. Do not spend money on education equivalency evaluation. USCIS do not care even if you submit 10 evaluations from different companies, they do not recognize. Fist, edu.evaluation is opinion only. It is not a binding document. Gets a letter from your school explaining the education pattern. It is more efficient. I did the same. They approve my 140 on the same date they reciived my reply.
The entire education equivalency has been screwed up by desi companies, desi workers, education evaluation agency and of course lawyers. USCIS had been very flexible till last 5 or 6 years. Because of substantial abuse, the USCIS had become stricter on the education evaluation. Peoples try to combine any degree (like 3 year b.com and 1 year PG diploma) to arrive at equivalent to 4 year BS in computer science. I have seen a post by one guy got a evaluation saying that his 3 year BSc in geography + 1 year computer course in NIIT/Aptech equal to 4 year BS in Comp.Sc. USCIS is not stupid to accept this is equivalent to 4 years computer science. I am not undermining any degree or school. Because of so much abuse, genuine guys like you and me I got affected. Though I studied in highly reputed schools, I got RFE in 140. It was a big surprise for me. It took tremendous amount of time/money/energy to overcome the RFE, though I graduated from one of the top 10 engineering school in India comparable standard with IITs.
Do not worry.. It will be alright..
more...
house de los premios Billboard,
amitjoey
08-06 10:44 AM
Calling - Phone campaign and meeting in person at the offices is much more effective
tattoo cristina urgel premios
aroranuj
11-22 12:39 PM
I was at the DC rally last year & it was truly a great feeling to participate not just in my, but OUR community's cause. We need to get as many people as we can involved. The rally got me energized & once I came back from the rally & meeting with lawmakers I became a lot more involved in calling lawmakers, sending letters, sending FOIA mails & doing all that I can. I am ready, willing and able to come to the rally & talk directly to lawmakers to make them aware of our distress....guys if you are reading this please JOIN US in our CAUSE!!!!!
Lets MARCH for our CAUSE!!!!
Lets MARCH for our CAUSE!!!!
more...
pictures se dio con Cristina Urgel
waitingmygc
04-29 05:43 PM
The most feasible, generic and acceptable options to all are:
1) Recapture of lost immigrant visas.
2) Remove per country quota for EB visas.
Otherwise, it will be more complex especially with �a green card will be immediately available to foreign students with an advanced degree from a United States institution of higher education ����.� option. Its seems this particular option is proposal of another EB category in itself or in other words �Divide and Rule�.
There are two options
1) Recapture of lost immigrant visas.
2) Removes per country quota for EB visas
I think this would clear the current backlogs.
1) Recapture of lost immigrant visas.
2) Remove per country quota for EB visas.
Otherwise, it will be more complex especially with �a green card will be immediately available to foreign students with an advanced degree from a United States institution of higher education ����.� option. Its seems this particular option is proposal of another EB category in itself or in other words �Divide and Rule�.
There are two options
1) Recapture of lost immigrant visas.
2) Removes per country quota for EB visas
I think this would clear the current backlogs.
dresses cristina urgel y kate del
swarnapuri
05-10 09:18 AM
There is a similar thread in immigrationportal web site which tracks the labor approvals in a comprehensive excel spread sheet with lots of informational graphs and analysis.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=161571&page=213&pp=15
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=161571&page=213&pp=15
more...
makeup Cristina Urgel (Pati),
th5000th
08-29 10:56 AM
Unique Transaction ID #5E61374953380653N
Business Name:
Immigration Voice (The recipient of this payment is Verified)
Email:
donations@immigrationvoice.org
Total Amount:
-$25.00 USD
Fee amount:
$0.00 USD
Net amount:
-$25.00 USD
Item Amount:
$25.00 USD
Shipping:
$0.00 USD
Handling:
$0.00 USD
Quantity:
1
Item Title:
Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: th5000th)
Date:
Aug. 28, 2009
Time:
07:21:18 PDT
Status:
Completed
Can you please grant me access at your earliest convenience? Thanks.
Business Name:
Immigration Voice (The recipient of this payment is Verified)
Email:
donations@immigrationvoice.org
Total Amount:
-$25.00 USD
Fee amount:
$0.00 USD
Net amount:
-$25.00 USD
Item Amount:
$25.00 USD
Shipping:
$0.00 USD
Handling:
$0.00 USD
Quantity:
1
Item Title:
Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: th5000th)
Date:
Aug. 28, 2009
Time:
07:21:18 PDT
Status:
Completed
Can you please grant me access at your earliest convenience? Thanks.
girlfriend Cristina Urgel,
ronhira
09-30 11:13 PM
OK, so, based on my data, the following came up:
FOIA
Result for Almond: Your position is 359 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "Bulgaria", Priority Date "Oct-02" and Category "EB3" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009
USCIS
Result for Almond: Your position is 5913 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "Bulgaria", Priority Date "Oct-02" and Category "EB3" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Nov, 2009.
Keep in mind today is September 30, 2009 when you look at the 2 dates above.
congrats man......
FOIA
Result for Almond: Your position is 359 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "Bulgaria", Priority Date "Oct-02" and Category "EB3" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009
USCIS
Result for Almond: Your position is 5913 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "Bulgaria", Priority Date "Oct-02" and Category "EB3" . Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Nov, 2009.
Keep in mind today is September 30, 2009 when you look at the 2 dates above.
congrats man......
hairstyles cristina urgel premios
nixstor
02-13 05:27 PM
you do not pay it back but when you file your taxes for the year 2008..which would be in 2009 they would deduct the amount you get as a rebate thru the stimulus package!!
Thats correct.
How ever, this part is interesting
If it turns out your 2008 income was lower than in 2007 and you should have gotten a lower rebate, you get to keep the difference.
As I read, if you owe taxes for 2008 in 2009, the rebate check would not piggy back on to the owed taxes. So If person X decides to change his normal withholding (which gets him the avg refund of 2600) in such a way that he owes taxes, he essentially has gotten away with the rebate check.
Thats correct.
How ever, this part is interesting
If it turns out your 2008 income was lower than in 2007 and you should have gotten a lower rebate, you get to keep the difference.
As I read, if you owe taxes for 2008 in 2009, the rebate check would not piggy back on to the owed taxes. So If person X decides to change his normal withholding (which gets him the avg refund of 2600) in such a way that he owes taxes, he essentially has gotten away with the rebate check.
english_august
07-06 02:58 PM
Alright friends, so we now have a lead item on Times of India on this effort.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2183334,prtpage-1.cms
Can we now have some of the Nays turn into Ayes? We now have proof that this effort is attracting media's attention, we now have proof that it is viable. Can we please make it a smashing success by getting great numbers?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2183334,prtpage-1.cms
Can we now have some of the Nays turn into Ayes? We now have proof that this effort is attracting media's attention, we now have proof that it is viable. Can we please make it a smashing success by getting great numbers?
thomachan72
06-28 02:40 PM
You are correct !!! You need to report at any point in the year, if you had more than 10K in any foreign bank account, you must report / attach the additional form along with Tax filing.
Reporting the interest is another think and some banks (Citibank) does issue a 1099-INT for the NRE account interest earned.
What is the rationale for this reporting.
Do you report that you have 500K in your US account? or do you report that you got $X as interest from your bank deposits here in the US. If that is the case with US accounts, why would you be required to report whatever amount you have in other foreign accounts??
You have to remember that as and when you "wire" money out of the US the IRS already is informed. Now this money that you transfered was generated within the US and you have paid all taxes that are due here. Why then would you simply report that you have "saved" this much money here or anywhere. There is absolutely no logic for reporting the actual principle amount (deposit) unless it is generated outside the US.
Let us say you are a US citizen/resident and you earn money in India and maintain a FD there. Then it makes sense in reporting your "income" in India.
Simply reporting the money that you initially transfered from the US to another account is just the same as reporting your account total in citizens bank in Alaska after you transfered funds from BOA in Texas to it. Its basically the same money but held in a different insitution.
What you are saying might be correct but I dont understand the logic.
Reporting the interest is another think and some banks (Citibank) does issue a 1099-INT for the NRE account interest earned.
What is the rationale for this reporting.
Do you report that you have 500K in your US account? or do you report that you got $X as interest from your bank deposits here in the US. If that is the case with US accounts, why would you be required to report whatever amount you have in other foreign accounts??
You have to remember that as and when you "wire" money out of the US the IRS already is informed. Now this money that you transfered was generated within the US and you have paid all taxes that are due here. Why then would you simply report that you have "saved" this much money here or anywhere. There is absolutely no logic for reporting the actual principle amount (deposit) unless it is generated outside the US.
Let us say you are a US citizen/resident and you earn money in India and maintain a FD there. Then it makes sense in reporting your "income" in India.
Simply reporting the money that you initially transfered from the US to another account is just the same as reporting your account total in citizens bank in Alaska after you transfered funds from BOA in Texas to it. Its basically the same money but held in a different insitution.
What you are saying might be correct but I dont understand the logic.
