lazycis
01-25 06:37 PM
Here is a good read about the issue
http://bibdaily.com/pdfs/AILA%20Mich%20DL%201-25-08.pdf
http://bibdaily.com/pdfs/AILA%20Mich%20DL%201-25-08.pdf
wallpaper seat ibiza 2001.
rsharma
09-26 10:47 AM
Result for belmontboy:
Your position is 47480 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Oct-07" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
spill over considered.
Wait time tracker doesnot make any sense....
Thank you IV core for getting the data and also creating this adjudication calculator.
However I too agree with Belmontboy that these dates looks unrealistic. It will be highly appreciated if IV core can post the formulations used to calculate the dates.
Once we know the formulations for these adjudication date calculator sused by IV this will authenticate these adjudication date calcultors created by IV.
But again I would like to thank IV core team and all of us for making USCIS make the 485 data public. This shows that if we all work together we can get the immigration system reformed that will help us as well as this great country.
Your position is 47480 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Oct-07" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
spill over considered.
Wait time tracker doesnot make any sense....
Thank you IV core for getting the data and also creating this adjudication calculator.
However I too agree with Belmontboy that these dates looks unrealistic. It will be highly appreciated if IV core can post the formulations used to calculate the dates.
Once we know the formulations for these adjudication date calculator sused by IV this will authenticate these adjudication date calcultors created by IV.
But again I would like to thank IV core team and all of us for making USCIS make the 485 data public. This shows that if we all work together we can get the immigration system reformed that will help us as well as this great country.
Kodi
05-24 07:17 AM
They should let people continue if they have a pending LC, like you pointed out we're already spent so much money even though its only to apply for LC.
2011 hot Used Seat Ibiza 2001 seat
ajju
02-07 11:07 PM
These rebates are based on 2007 Tax year.
If you have ITIN for Tax year 2006 and file your taxes for 2007 with SSN (After one got EAD and applied for SSN), then those people should be good to go.
I hope i am not missing anything.
Thanks.
My 2 cents...
Most of the July filers will have SSN, so no issue... Even ITIN (legal dependents) should also be fine per my understanding.. as ITIN is not eligible for work by nature.. So illegals don't need ITIN.. They either have fraud SSNs or nothing at all... In 2001, my married friends with wife did get family rebate of $600... So I am hopeful for H4 folks this time also...
If you have ITIN for Tax year 2006 and file your taxes for 2007 with SSN (After one got EAD and applied for SSN), then those people should be good to go.
I hope i am not missing anything.
Thanks.
My 2 cents...
Most of the July filers will have SSN, so no issue... Even ITIN (legal dependents) should also be fine per my understanding.. as ITIN is not eligible for work by nature.. So illegals don't need ITIN.. They either have fraud SSNs or nothing at all... In 2001, my married friends with wife did get family rebate of $600... So I am hopeful for H4 folks this time also...
more...
waitnwatch
12-13 10:54 AM
Do any of you remember Dan Siciliano of Stanford, Friedman of Harvard (I may be wrong about the affiliation) and another professor from Iowa talk at a Senate hearing. These are people with much better credentials than Matloff. The question here is how important is Matloff. Who listens to him. Has he ever been called for a hearing? I doubt it. He is just an obscure computer science professor at UC Davis. What are his credentials and why would somebody listen to him in exclusion to the economics and law professors who have much better credentials and expertise on the issue than him. Wouldn't it be a better idea to talk to the professors who were at the hearing and see if we can get them to write for us. Could we not use our media contacts and ask them to talk to one of the acknowledged experts. Can we not align ourselves with them. Are we not giving too much importance to Matloff. Also why does Matloff stand alone by himself. Why is there no other professor who is quoted by numbersusa. Isn't it obvious that Matloff is a nobody and talking to him gives him way more importance than is due?
summitpointe
11-26 02:15 PM
In Nashville you can get many friends if you visit Sri Ganesha temple. You can post documents in Indian stores and restaurants. There used to vents organized by like Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Marathi associations. You can get their list from temple people and send an e-mail to everyone.
more...
honge_kamyaab
09-14 09:03 AM
First of all I commend your and everyone in putting their effort. I totally agree with you that we need more people and money. I think people are first to come and money will automatically follow.
While word-of-mouth is effective we can augment this to get attention using other means:
1. We can persuade news portals to advertise for our cause in a corner that might help us to get more people. Most Indians I know read Indian news everyday. If we can convince e.g., eenadu.net a telugu newspaper, to run ads we can get attention of lot people.
2. Please start selling the current acheivements that are not confidential. Like you might have been successful in persuading a high profile senator about this problem. Put his quotes on our site and also possible grab attention from bloggers.
3. If we can also tap academia who support skilled immigration that would help us. Let us put there studies in our reference section (I am assuming we didn't do this yet). This
makes senator to reference our site and make their lives easy.
4. Please do not discount freewill members who do not have a GC problem but savor
helping others with immigration problem. It could be Americans or Immigrants we'll get them all in.
I think these actions will help us grow our strength. I know it is easy said than done.
-Kishore.
While word-of-mouth is effective we can augment this to get attention using other means:
1. We can persuade news portals to advertise for our cause in a corner that might help us to get more people. Most Indians I know read Indian news everyday. If we can convince e.g., eenadu.net a telugu newspaper, to run ads we can get attention of lot people.
2. Please start selling the current acheivements that are not confidential. Like you might have been successful in persuading a high profile senator about this problem. Put his quotes on our site and also possible grab attention from bloggers.
3. If we can also tap academia who support skilled immigration that would help us. Let us put there studies in our reference section (I am assuming we didn't do this yet). This
makes senator to reference our site and make their lives easy.
4. Please do not discount freewill members who do not have a GC problem but savor
helping others with immigration problem. It could be Americans or Immigrants we'll get them all in.
I think these actions will help us grow our strength. I know it is easy said than done.
-Kishore.
2010 cd seat IBIZA 2001
xman_74
04-18 08:56 AM
New_Horizon,
Thanks for the posting. I have seen little info on cases from Michigan. My status is as follows:
PD - April 2001
EB2, Non-IRI, Traditional.
April 2004. Michigan Dep Career Dev rejected application.
July 2004. Employer appealed.
Dec 28, 2004. Case moved to DBEC
45-day letter ?
Hi FinalGC, that's great success story. I wish everybody else could hang on to that hope.
By the way, to an earlier message asking for status.
My status so far:
PD - Oct 2002
EB3, Non-RIR
Michigan
45-Day: Received 1/16/06 :)
Replied: 1/23/06.
Now Waiting :confused:
Thanks for the posting. I have seen little info on cases from Michigan. My status is as follows:
PD - April 2001
EB2, Non-IRI, Traditional.
April 2004. Michigan Dep Career Dev rejected application.
July 2004. Employer appealed.
Dec 28, 2004. Case moved to DBEC
45-day letter ?
Hi FinalGC, that's great success story. I wish everybody else could hang on to that hope.
By the way, to an earlier message asking for status.
My status so far:
PD - Oct 2002
EB3, Non-RIR
Michigan
45-Day: Received 1/16/06 :)
Replied: 1/23/06.
Now Waiting :confused:
more...
walking_dude
11-27 09:17 PM
First of all lets get a few thousand members to attend. The rest can wait. I had started a thread for contributions. It has been having the least possible activity.
IV has become a site for water-cooler discussions about mundane issues. I wish we remained focused on the reason this site was founded , instead of degenerating into an forum to discuss mundane issues.
I think we need better plan for fund requirement. How much is needed and where to be spent. This will give us better idea.
I agree with you on that, lets try to collect some money from the people who work and own BPO projects.
A lot if Indians are working in the IT sector, I believe we should get in touch with them
There are soo many IT companies in VA and DC, lets try to contact them, I am sure some Desi employers will work with us.
What do you all think?
I got 3-RED dots for supporting AC21 compaign. I did feel bad (not for reds but their thoughts behind) and pity for those
IV has become a site for water-cooler discussions about mundane issues. I wish we remained focused on the reason this site was founded , instead of degenerating into an forum to discuss mundane issues.
I think we need better plan for fund requirement. How much is needed and where to be spent. This will give us better idea.
I agree with you on that, lets try to collect some money from the people who work and own BPO projects.
A lot if Indians are working in the IT sector, I believe we should get in touch with them
There are soo many IT companies in VA and DC, lets try to contact them, I am sure some Desi employers will work with us.
What do you all think?
I got 3-RED dots for supporting AC21 compaign. I did feel bad (not for reds but their thoughts behind) and pity for those
hair Photos de SEAT IBIZA SDI 2001
arnab221
09-25 03:14 PM
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--Paragraph (1) shall take effect for applications filed at least 30 days after the creation of the list described in paragraph (2).
(d) H-1B Nonimmigrants Not Admitted for Jobs Advertised or Offered Only to H-1B Nonimmigrants.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(1) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
``(H)(i) The employer has not advertised the available jobs specified in the application in an advertisement that states or indicates that--
``(I) the job or jobs are only available to persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants; or
``(II) persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants shall receive priority or a preference in the hiring process.
``(ii) The employer has not only recruited persons who are, or who may become, H-1B nonimmigrants to fill the job or jobs.''; and
(2) in the undesignated paragraph at the end, by striking ``The employer'' and inserting the following:
``(K) The employer''.
(e) Prohibition of Outplacement.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 212(n) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by amending subparagraph (F) to read as follows:
``(F) The employer shall not place, outsource, lease, or otherwise contract for the placement of an alien admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant with another employer;'' and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Limit on Percentage of H-1B Employees.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended by inserting after subparagraph (H), as added by subsection (d)(1), the following:
``(I) If the employer employs not less than 50 employees in the United States, not more than 50 percent of such employees are H-1B nonimmigrants.''.
(g) Wage Determination.--
(1) CHANGE IN MINIMUM WAGES.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
``(A) The employer--
``(i) is offering and will offer, during the period of authorized employment, to aliens admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant, wages, based on the best information available at the time the application is filed, which are not less than the highest of--
``(I) the locally determined prevailing wage level for the occupational classification in the area of employment;
``(II) the median average wage for all workers in the occupational classification in the area of employment; or
``(III) the median wage for skill level 2 in the occupational classification found in the most recent Occupational Employment Statistics survey; and
``(ii) will provide working conditions for such a nonimmigrant that will not adversely affect the working conditions of workers similarly employed.''; and
(B) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``the wage determination methodology used under subparagraph (A)(i),'' after ``shall contain''.
(2) PROVISION OF W-2 FORMS.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act is amended by inserting after subparagraph (I), as added by subsection (f), the following:
``(J) If the employer, in such previous period as the Secretary shall specify, employed 1 or more H-1B nonimmigrants, the employer shall submit to the Secretary the Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 Wage and Tax Statement filed by the employer with respect to such nonimmigrants for such period.''.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(h) Immigration Documents.--Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(l) Employer To Share All Immigration Paperwork Exchanged With Federal Agencies.--Not later than 10 working days after receiving a written request from a former, current, or future employee or beneficiary, an employer shall provide the employee or beneficiary with the original (or a certified copy of the original) of all petitions, notices, and other written communication exchanged between the employer and the Department of Labor, the Department of Homeland Security, or any other Federal agency that is related to an immigrant or nonimmigrant petition filed by the employer for the employee or beneficiary.''.
SEC. 3303. H-1B GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Safeguards Against Fraud and Misrepresentation in Application Review Process.--Section 212(n)(1)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as redesignated by section 3302 (d)(2), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``and through the Department of Labor's website, without charge.'' after ``D.C.'';
(2) by inserting ``, clear indicators of fraud, misrepresentation of material fact,'' after ``completeness'';
(3) by striking ``or obviously inaccurate'' and inserting ``, presents clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, or is obviously inaccurate'';
(4) by striking ``within 7 days of'' and inserting ``not later than 14 days after''; and
(5) by adding at the end the following: ``If the Secretary's review of an application identifies clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, the Secretary may conduct an investigation and hearing under paragraph (2).
(b) Investigations by Department of Labor.--Section 212(n)(2) of such Act is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``12 months'' and inserting ``24 months''; and
(B) by striking ``The Secretary shall conduct'' and all that follows and inserting ``Upon the receipt of such a complaint, the Secretary may initiate an investigation to determine if such a failure or misrepresentation has occurred.'';
(2) in subparagraph (C)(i)--
(A) by striking ``a condition of paragraph (1)(B), (1)(E), or (1)(F)'' and inserting ``a condition under subparagraph (B), (C)(i), (E), (F), (H), (I), or (J) of paragraph (1)''; and
(B) by striking ``(1)(C)'' and inserting ``(1)(C)(ii)'';
(3) in subparagraph (G)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``if the Secretary'' and all that follows and inserting ``with regard to the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ``and whose identity'' and all that follows through ``failure or failures.'' and inserting ``the Secretary of Labor may conduct an investigation into the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(C) in clause (iii), by striking the last sentence;
(d) H-1B Nonimmigrants Not Admitted for Jobs Advertised or Offered Only to H-1B Nonimmigrants.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(1) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
``(H)(i) The employer has not advertised the available jobs specified in the application in an advertisement that states or indicates that--
``(I) the job or jobs are only available to persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants; or
``(II) persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants shall receive priority or a preference in the hiring process.
``(ii) The employer has not only recruited persons who are, or who may become, H-1B nonimmigrants to fill the job or jobs.''; and
(2) in the undesignated paragraph at the end, by striking ``The employer'' and inserting the following:
``(K) The employer''.
(e) Prohibition of Outplacement.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 212(n) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by amending subparagraph (F) to read as follows:
``(F) The employer shall not place, outsource, lease, or otherwise contract for the placement of an alien admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant with another employer;'' and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Limit on Percentage of H-1B Employees.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended by inserting after subparagraph (H), as added by subsection (d)(1), the following:
``(I) If the employer employs not less than 50 employees in the United States, not more than 50 percent of such employees are H-1B nonimmigrants.''.
(g) Wage Determination.--
(1) CHANGE IN MINIMUM WAGES.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
``(A) The employer--
``(i) is offering and will offer, during the period of authorized employment, to aliens admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant, wages, based on the best information available at the time the application is filed, which are not less than the highest of--
``(I) the locally determined prevailing wage level for the occupational classification in the area of employment;
``(II) the median average wage for all workers in the occupational classification in the area of employment; or
``(III) the median wage for skill level 2 in the occupational classification found in the most recent Occupational Employment Statistics survey; and
``(ii) will provide working conditions for such a nonimmigrant that will not adversely affect the working conditions of workers similarly employed.''; and
(B) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``the wage determination methodology used under subparagraph (A)(i),'' after ``shall contain''.
(2) PROVISION OF W-2 FORMS.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act is amended by inserting after subparagraph (I), as added by subsection (f), the following:
``(J) If the employer, in such previous period as the Secretary shall specify, employed 1 or more H-1B nonimmigrants, the employer shall submit to the Secretary the Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 Wage and Tax Statement filed by the employer with respect to such nonimmigrants for such period.''.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(h) Immigration Documents.--Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(l) Employer To Share All Immigration Paperwork Exchanged With Federal Agencies.--Not later than 10 working days after receiving a written request from a former, current, or future employee or beneficiary, an employer shall provide the employee or beneficiary with the original (or a certified copy of the original) of all petitions, notices, and other written communication exchanged between the employer and the Department of Labor, the Department of Homeland Security, or any other Federal agency that is related to an immigrant or nonimmigrant petition filed by the employer for the employee or beneficiary.''.
SEC. 3303. H-1B GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Safeguards Against Fraud and Misrepresentation in Application Review Process.--Section 212(n)(1)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as redesignated by section 3302 (d)(2), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``and through the Department of Labor's website, without charge.'' after ``D.C.'';
(2) by inserting ``, clear indicators of fraud, misrepresentation of material fact,'' after ``completeness'';
(3) by striking ``or obviously inaccurate'' and inserting ``, presents clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, or is obviously inaccurate'';
(4) by striking ``within 7 days of'' and inserting ``not later than 14 days after''; and
(5) by adding at the end the following: ``If the Secretary's review of an application identifies clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, the Secretary may conduct an investigation and hearing under paragraph (2).
(b) Investigations by Department of Labor.--Section 212(n)(2) of such Act is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``12 months'' and inserting ``24 months''; and
(B) by striking ``The Secretary shall conduct'' and all that follows and inserting ``Upon the receipt of such a complaint, the Secretary may initiate an investigation to determine if such a failure or misrepresentation has occurred.'';
(2) in subparagraph (C)(i)--
(A) by striking ``a condition of paragraph (1)(B), (1)(E), or (1)(F)'' and inserting ``a condition under subparagraph (B), (C)(i), (E), (F), (H), (I), or (J) of paragraph (1)''; and
(B) by striking ``(1)(C)'' and inserting ``(1)(C)(ii)'';
(3) in subparagraph (G)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``if the Secretary'' and all that follows and inserting ``with regard to the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ``and whose identity'' and all that follows through ``failure or failures.'' and inserting ``the Secretary of Labor may conduct an investigation into the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(C) in clause (iii), by striking the last sentence;
more...
gangwar
07-05 03:00 PM
Here is what we decided to do at local level in Colorado.
So far we could gather 22 people locally , we sent mails and phone calls to two local news papers with detail whatever USCIS did in previous months.
We are gathering at local ftd collection center and sending 22 bucket to USCIS. Hoping local media will publish it.
Good luck for others in their efforts.
So far we could gather 22 people locally , we sent mails and phone calls to two local news papers with detail whatever USCIS did in previous months.
We are gathering at local ftd collection center and sending 22 bucket to USCIS. Hoping local media will publish it.
Good luck for others in their efforts.
hot wallpaper Used Seat Ibiza 2001
jungalee43
11-22 01:35 PM
Barring any unforeseen problems, I am in
more...
house A 2001 Seat Ibiza Chill no
hazishak
07-03 01:09 PM
It's a great idea to send flowers to the USCIS. Lets do it on 9th july.
tattoo seat ibiza 2001.
raj3078
01-23 01:42 PM
I believe in lawsuits. This country does also.. Lets face it nothing actually gets done unless there is fear of law.
I believe in equal rights (excluding voting rights, as we are legals here). We came from the front door. Stood in line at visa embassies, paid visa fees etc etc. We did not cross the border. We pay federal, state and social security taxes as US citizens..So while giving licenses, there should be nothing on it which discriminates us from the rest. They dont discriminate when they take our taxes. Blood and Money have the same color.
Lets talk in the same language as these ppl who have no respect for legal high skilled immigrants.
Lets roll!
Well said...My friend brett who is citizen says....America is country in which Lawyers are everywhere....They are the lawmakers and they are the ones who challenge those laws and they are the ones who gets most benefitted....;) Just look at current presidential nominees in DEMs
I believe in equal rights (excluding voting rights, as we are legals here). We came from the front door. Stood in line at visa embassies, paid visa fees etc etc. We did not cross the border. We pay federal, state and social security taxes as US citizens..So while giving licenses, there should be nothing on it which discriminates us from the rest. They dont discriminate when they take our taxes. Blood and Money have the same color.
Lets talk in the same language as these ppl who have no respect for legal high skilled immigrants.
Lets roll!
Well said...My friend brett who is citizen says....America is country in which Lawyers are everywhere....They are the lawmakers and they are the ones who challenge those laws and they are the ones who gets most benefitted....;) Just look at current presidential nominees in DEMs
more...
pictures Used 2001 Seat Ibiza for sale
transpass
08-01 02:35 PM
I read somewhere there may be between 8k-12k EB2 applications received on July 2.
Anyone else has any definite numbers?
Yes, I think Neb received around 8k and texas received 4k on july2. But they include eb1+eb2+eb3...And btw, not all of them have their pd current...
Anyone else has any definite numbers?
Yes, I think Neb received around 8k and texas received 4k on july2. But they include eb1+eb2+eb3...And btw, not all of them have their pd current...
dresses Seat Ibiza II P.2 1999
raj19720926
05-11 11:51 AM
"NewUser" may I ask you if you travelled back after April 5 2010 ? as the information on German website got changed after that ...and now as "ntpatil" has said they are not listing AP.
I am in the same boat like "ntpatil" I called Lufthansa USA customer service, as well as their India airport and reservation office...all the three Lufthansa sources indicate that AP holder does not need to get air transit visa. and they will take AP copy before boarding Plane in India.
on the other hand tI asked thegerman consulate �..see the email reply from German Consulate dated 5/ 10 /2010 �.says following
"Sorry an Advance parole is no Residence permit, neither does it exempt from requirement of Airport Transit visa.
At least that is what my headquarters in Germany told me, with an Advance Parole an Airport Transit Visa is needed.
Yours sincerely,
by order
Head of Visa Section
Vice Consul
Consulate General of the Republic of
Germany in Boston
Three Copley Place, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02116"
so the question is if Lufthansa is not asking for Air Transit Visa when boarding from India and German consulate is expecting AP holder to have one.....as per the above email
is there any one in Germany who is enforcing this new change when the passenger lands form a plan in India ....?
if you see the following link and fill in the correct information �..
Visa And Health - Star Alliance (http://www.staralliance.com/en/services/visa-and-health/)
it�s really not clear how the new changes are getting enforced
I am hoping someone who has just returned back to USA via Germany can inform us if any one asked or checked for a legal documents after arrival�
I
maybe it�s a very new change and Lufthansa has not just started enforcing it�.but no question removal of AP from the website happened�.in last month it was there before�.
If they started enforcing it�s a hassle to travel via Germany
Anyone who has travelled back to USA via German Airport please share your experience
I am in the same boat like "ntpatil" I called Lufthansa USA customer service, as well as their India airport and reservation office...all the three Lufthansa sources indicate that AP holder does not need to get air transit visa. and they will take AP copy before boarding Plane in India.
on the other hand tI asked thegerman consulate �..see the email reply from German Consulate dated 5/ 10 /2010 �.says following
"Sorry an Advance parole is no Residence permit, neither does it exempt from requirement of Airport Transit visa.
At least that is what my headquarters in Germany told me, with an Advance Parole an Airport Transit Visa is needed.
Yours sincerely,
by order
Head of Visa Section
Vice Consul
Consulate General of the Republic of
Germany in Boston
Three Copley Place, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02116"
so the question is if Lufthansa is not asking for Air Transit Visa when boarding from India and German consulate is expecting AP holder to have one.....as per the above email
is there any one in Germany who is enforcing this new change when the passenger lands form a plan in India ....?
if you see the following link and fill in the correct information �..
Visa And Health - Star Alliance (http://www.staralliance.com/en/services/visa-and-health/)
it�s really not clear how the new changes are getting enforced
I am hoping someone who has just returned back to USA via Germany can inform us if any one asked or checked for a legal documents after arrival�
I
maybe it�s a very new change and Lufthansa has not just started enforcing it�.but no question removal of AP from the website happened�.in last month it was there before�.
If they started enforcing it�s a hassle to travel via Germany
Anyone who has travelled back to USA via German Airport please share your experience
more...
makeup dresses Used Seat Ibiza 2001
GCOP
07-16 04:27 PM
IV or its members are not against anybody. All we are trying to do is, to reduce our delays of getting Greencard. All the groups know that EB-3 is in the worst shape and still the cases of 2001 are being processed. Situation is really Frustrating. I hope we can find out some solution to reduce the delay.
girlfriend Fotos de Seat Ibiza Tdi Sport
bigboy007
10-29 12:44 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
hairstyles SEAT IBIZA STELLA 2001
ujjvalkoul
09-20 01:41 PM
Same thing with this link too. I guess this thread would provide teh same info as well...so I will ubscribe to this one.
sparklinks
11-05 10:18 AM
Paper filed at TSC for self and spouse.
Receipt Date : 10/05
Approval Date: 10/19
Receipt Date : 10/05
Approval Date: 10/19
deekay
08-01 02:46 PM
I got the magic email today
Here are my particulars
PD - Jan 2004 EB2 India
RD - Jun 27 -2007
ND - Aug 8 -2008 TX
Here are my particulars
PD - Jan 2004 EB2 India
RD - Jun 27 -2007
ND - Aug 8 -2008 TX
